[U-Boot] [WIP][PATCH 00/11] bootm refactoring

[Kumar Gala]

On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:15 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> Dear Kumar Gala,
>
> In message <B10531D5-A045-4A60- 
> A368-9ADA9590B5C3 at kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
>>
>> I'm adding a "boots" command that implements sub commands.  Once I
>
> I saw it. Actually I don't like it. Why didn't you stick with the
> original plan to implement subcommands as part of bootm ?

Can you be more precise about what you dont like.  Just the new  
command, how its implemented, or something else?  Also, what plan did  
we agree on?

I choose a new command because of my concern about how to distinguish  
the sub-command from a FIT identifier.  But it looks like that might  
not be an issue.

Its easy enough to fold the boots subcommands into bootm.  Is there  
something else that needs to be done?

- k