[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 4/5] AT91CAP9 support : board/ files

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Sun Feb 3 21:58:41 CET 2008


On 13:54 Sun 03 Feb     , Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 22:25:54 +0100
> Stelian Pop <stelian at popies.net> wrote:
> 
> > Le samedi 02 février 2008 à 06:59 +0100, Stefan Roese a écrit :
> > 
> > > > I did think of that. I have no strong feeling about that. Except that if
> > > > we put at91cap9adk under board/atmel, at91rm9200dk should go there too.  
> > > 
> > > Right. I always prefer to "collect" board ports from one manufacturer/brand 
> > > into a specific directory.  
> > 
> > Manufacturer or brand/type ? Meaning, what do we do with the other AT91
> > based boards, which are not made by Atmel (cmc_pu2, csb637, kb9202,
> > mp2usb) ?
> 
> I think they should be collected according to board manufacturer or
> brand, not cpu type. So boards/atmel is for boards manufactured by
> Atmel, not all boards that happen to have an Atmel cpu on them.

I agree too, they should be collected according to board manufacturer
not cpu type.

Best Regards,
J.




More information about the U-Boot mailing list