[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] [new uImage] rework error handling so common functions don't reset

[Kumar Gala]

On Feb 22, 2008, at 8:36 AM, Bartlomiej Sieka wrote:

> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Kumar,
>> in message <Pine.LNX. 
>> 4.64.0802181306060.21964 at blarg.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>>> Changed image_get_ramdisk() to just return NULL on error and have
>>> get_ramdisk() propogate that error to the caller.  It's left to the
>>> caller to call do_reset() if it wants to.
>>>
>>> Also moved calling do_reset() in get_fdt() on ppc to a common  
>>> location.
>>> In the future we will change get_fdt() to return success/failure and
>>> not call do_reset() at all.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
>> Just to make my position clear: I expect that you negotiate new-image
>> related patches more or less directly with Bartek, who I consider  as
>> kind of "new-image" custodian.
>> That means that I will not track the state of these patches - if  you
>> want me to apply something directly, please ring a bell.
>> Bartek: I would also appreciate if you could merge Kumar's patches in
>> a local repo and then send me just a pull request when something is
>> ready to go into u-boot-testing (or even into mainline).
>
> OK, will coordinate new uImage stuff that gets posted to the list,  
> and request pulling as needed.

Works for me.  I'll look at updating my patches based on the new code  
in the branch.

- k