[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/2] Add support for a Freescale non-CPM SPIcontroller
Ben Warren
biggerbadderben at gmail.com
Mon Jan 14 05:04:22 CET 2008
Liu Dave wrote:
>>>> +typedef struct spi834x
>>>> +{
>>>> + u8 res0[0x20]; /* 0x0-0x01f reserved */
>>>> + u32 mode; /* mode register */
>>>> + u32 event; /* event register */
>>>> + u32 mask; /* mask register */
>>>> + u32 com; /* command register */
>>>> + u32 tx; /* transmit register */
>>>> + u32 rx; /* receive register */
>>>> + u8 res1[0xC8]; /* fill up to 0x100 */
>>>> + } spi834x_t;
>>>>
>>>>
>>> please put this into fsl_spi.h to reuse for different 8xxx family.
>>>
>>>
>> Can you confirm that the registers in 85xx are the same? If so, I'll
>> move this.
>>
>
> Ben, at lease the 8610 has the same SPI as 834x.
>
> The 8360 and 8568 with CPU mode have likely SPI as 834x.
>
I just looked up the RM for 8360, and for some reason its register
offsets are a *bit* different than the 8349. I'll move this struct to
fsl_spi.h, but we'll have to do some #ifdef magic to work with multiple
processors, I guess.
regards,
Ben
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list