[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Refactor ECC POST for AMCC Denali core
Jerry Van Baren
gerald.vanbaren at ge.com
Mon Jan 14 17:56:57 CET 2008
Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> On Monday 14 January 2008, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
[snip]
>> As you should have picked up by now, a sync (forcing all I/O to
>> complete) followed by eieio is silly - the eieio is superfluous. Seeing
>> syncs/isyncs/eieios sprinkled in code is an indication that the author
>> didn't understand what was going on and, as a result, kept hitting the
>> problem with a bigger and bigger hammer until it appeared to have gone
>> away.
>
> Now I'm glad that I'm not the author of this code. ;) But I admit that I did
> use this "hammer" in the past.
As have we all. The only difference is that most of us don't get
caught. ;-) Open source and git: it both exposes and attributes all
stupidity. :-D
[snip]
> From what I see, the ECC test code uses in_be32() and friends to access the
> memory. And these access functions have all necessary barriers already built
> into. So most likely the additional barriers were never necessary at all. Or
> perhaps the code was changed from using pointer access to in_be32() access.
>
> Nevertheless the changes from Larry are looking good to me. But I also
> forwarded them to the original author of the code for review.
Good, that is what I wanted to get across - someone familiar with the
code and the processor reviews what, why, when, and how (Larry, you, the
original author, the list, etc.).
I figured that there must have been barriers that didn't show up in the
patch since it "mostly works." I'm suspicious that there is a missing
or misplaced barrier. The "sync ; eieio" pixie dust that Larry removed
makes me suspicious that something is missing going into the test. In
that case, the removed "sync" probably *IS* necessary, but that needs to
be understood and commented (and possibly moved to a better location).
> Thanks again for your comments.
>
> /me goes to mark jvb's mail as important to easier find it as reference. :)
:-) Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Stefan
Ditto,
gvb
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list