[U-Boot-Users] [ARM] Add support for AT91CAP9cpu andAT91CAP9A-DK board

Stelian Pop stelian at popies.net
Tue Jan 29 10:11:03 CET 2008


Le lundi 28 janvier 2008 à 18:22 +0100, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :

> Of course, u-boot does only need a (small) subset of it. If you prefer,
> I can simplify it.
> 
> ==> Which will make it harder to maintain.

Note however this is the path the Linux kernel developers chose too.

>         These files are automatically generated from the chip database,
>         and most of the stuff can conceivably be used by U-Boot.
>         -- Even if they are not used today.

Smells like over-engineering at this point.
> 
>         If a bug is detected in the file, then the place to update is inside the database.
>         Obviously ansy script generating the data, should be modified to generate
>         something which can be directly used by U-Boot without any further modification.

The question is whether it can be possible to make such a script to
generate header files in accordance with the coding styles :)

>         It may make sense to split up the file as well, as Haavard proposes,
>         but preferably, the split should be done at the source.
>         I will forward this request to the AT91 & CAP teams

Sure, if they do this it would be perfect. Meanwhile, let's start with
the one I've submitted (30 kb is better than 400 kb anyway). If/when
Atmel cooks up clean and splitted header files then we will import those
ones.

-- 
Stelian Pop <stelian at popies.net>





More information about the U-Boot mailing list