[U-Boot-Users] [ARM] Add support for AT91CAP9cpu andAT91CAP9A-DK board
Stelian Pop
stelian at popies.net
Tue Jan 29 10:11:03 CET 2008
Le lundi 28 janvier 2008 à 18:22 +0100, Ulf Samuelsson a écrit :
> Of course, u-boot does only need a (small) subset of it. If you prefer,
> I can simplify it.
>
> ==> Which will make it harder to maintain.
Note however this is the path the Linux kernel developers chose too.
> These files are automatically generated from the chip database,
> and most of the stuff can conceivably be used by U-Boot.
> -- Even if they are not used today.
Smells like over-engineering at this point.
>
> If a bug is detected in the file, then the place to update is inside the database.
> Obviously ansy script generating the data, should be modified to generate
> something which can be directly used by U-Boot without any further modification.
The question is whether it can be possible to make such a script to
generate header files in accordance with the coding styles :)
> It may make sense to split up the file as well, as Haavard proposes,
> but preferably, the split should be done at the source.
> I will forward this request to the AT91 & CAP teams
Sure, if they do this it would be perfect. Meanwhile, let's start with
the one I've submitted (30 kb is better than 400 kb anyway). If/when
Atmel cooks up clean and splitted header files then we will import those
ones.
--
Stelian Pop <stelian at popies.net>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list