[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for ATMELAT91SAM9G20EK board

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:14:02 -0500
<Ken.Fuchs at bench.com> wrote:

> U-Boot already has too many
> preprocessor constants and the addition of another (perhaps)
> dubious one merits more debate.

I don't completely agree. U-Boot has too many #ifdefs, which isn't
necessarily the same as too many #defines. And I don't think
CONFIG_AT91 is dubious at all.

But since we already have a CONFIG_AVR32 #define, we can clean up the
mess in macb.c by simply reversing the logic.

Haavard