[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 1/1] Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9G20EK board

[Hong Xu]

Hi Ben Warren,

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:51, Ben Warren <biggerbadderben at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Hong Xu,
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Hong Xu <hongxu.cn at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >From 81230b02610c06fdc8a175e635851346488e3bdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Hong Xu <hong.xu at atmel.com>
>> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:25:05 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Add support for ATMEL AT91SAM9G20EK board
>>
>> This patch adds support for ATMEL AT91SAM9G20EK board.
>> User manual for AT91SAM9G20EK board, see
>> http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc6413.pdf
>> AT91 SAM9G20 datasheet, see
>> http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc6384.pdf
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hong Xu <hong.xu at atmel.com>
>> ---
> <snip>
>> diff --git a/net/eth.c b/net/eth.c
>> index 38979aa..3f50e2b 100644
>> --- a/net/eth.c
>> +++ b/net/eth.c
>> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ int eth_initialize(bd_t *bis)
>>        mcdmafec_initialize(bis);
>>  #endif
>>  #if defined(CONFIG_AT91CAP9) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9260) || \
>> -    defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9263)
>> +    defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9263) || defined(CONFIG_AT91SAM9G20)
>>        at91sam9_eth_initialize(bis);
>>  #endif
>>
>
> Please don't touch net/eth.c.  Instead, implement the following in board code:

Actually I did NOT touch the logic in net/eth.c. I just said, "hey,
since you guys have the logic, please make a call for me.". That's it.
:-)
Thanks.

>
> int board_eth_init(bd_t *bis);
>
> Please be sure to check that the weak version of board_eth_init() is
> overridden (the board_eth_init and __def_eth_init symbols should have
> different addresses in the object code).  You can do something like:
>
> $ cat System.map | grep eth_init
>
> regards,
> Ben
>