[U-Boot-Users] using a flat device tree to drive u-boot config

[Jon Loeliger]

Kumar Gala wrote:
>> Our main interest in using FDT for U-Boot is to make it dynamically  
>> configurable having just one image for various variants of the  
>> hardware. Replacing config.h completely seems overkill to me (and  
>> will not even be possible).
> 
> Agreed.  I'm not suggesting replacing config.h, but removing bits and  
> pieces of it.
> 
> - k

I think we should first spend more serious effort towards
installing Konfig structure and building into the config mix.

jdl