[U-Boot-Users] ppc4xx: [PATCH] ML507 Board Support

[Ricardo Ribalda Delgado]

Hi all

I have just prepared, tested and sent a patch.

   Best regards

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Stefan Roese <sr at denx.de> wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> On Tuesday 29 July 2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> In message <200807171039.38227.sr at denx.de> you wrote:
>> > > > #define CFG_MBYTES_SDRAM        256
>> > >
>> > > No. All boards, especially all PowerPC boards, should use dynamic
>> > > memory size detection.
>> >
>> > You are probably referring to calling get_ram_size() instead of just
>> > returning the configured fixed value. But what do we gain here.
>> > get_ram_size() also needs the ram-size as parameter. Not sure if this is
>> > an improvement on such fixed systems.
>>
>> It just needs a maximum possible size.
>
> OK, this would be the 256 MB from above again.
>
>> One major advantage is for example that get_ram_size() verifies  that
>> RAM is actually working, and of expected size. It is a very efficient
>> test to make sure your hardware is actually working.
>
> But what exactly should happen if such a board with only one possible memory
> size configuration detects ram_size != configured ram_size?
>
> OK, this small check is an improvement over no check at all. Is it acceptable
> that I add this get_ram_size() with an additional patch? This would safe me
> from resetting my "next" branch or reverting patches.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
>
> =====================================================================
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office at denx.de
> =====================================================================
>



-- 
Ricardo Ribalda
http://www.eps.uam.es/~rribalda/