[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Add MIMC200 board - now uses board_eth_init()

[Scott Wood]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <20080728202251.GA28802 at ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> you wrote:
>> Aligning with TABs (or at all, in initializer lists) is not a good thing,
> 
> It is mandatory per Coding Style requirements.

Where?  I don't see any mention of alignment, and while there's no 
explicit definition of indentation, the rationale states that the choice 
of 8 characters for indentation is "to clearly define where
a block of control starts and ends", which has nothing to do with alignment.

>> IMO -- it screws things up when viewed with any other tab size (and why
>> else have tabs in the first place?).
> 
> What do you mean by "other tab size'? See Linux kernel coding style,
> Chapter 1: Indentation:
> 
> 	Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8
> 	characters.
> 
> Tabs are 8 characters. Full stop.

Yes, 8 is the "official" tab size for the Linux and U-Boot projects, for 
purposes of line length limits, etc.

That doesn't mean we should go out of our way to screw up alignment when 
a different size is used, when it's so easy to avoid.  What's the point 
of using TAB as a crappy compression scheme, rather than giving it 
semantic meaning as the block indentation level?

-Scott