[U-Boot-Users] arm920t RAM relocation broken?

Cory T. Tusar ctusar at videon-central.com
Thu Mar 6 22:05:05 CET 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Commit d4fc6012 added an #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 construct around the
RAM relocation bits in cpu/arm920t/start.S.  More directly, it added an
entire secondary relocation snippet surrounded by an 
#ifdef CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC construct.

It appears that this second implementation was later removed in commit
80767a6c, but the #ifdef CONFIG_AT91RM9200 logic was not removed also.

Is RAM relocation only intended to function on at91rm9200 boards, or
shall I submit a patch fixing the above?

- -Cory


- -- 
Cory T. Tusar
Embedded Systems Engineer
Videon Central, Inc.
2171 Sandy Drive
State College, PA 16803
(814) 235-1111 x316
(814) 235-1118 fax


"There are two ways of constructing a software design.  One way is to
 make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the
 other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
 deficiencies."  --Sir Charles Anthony Richard Hoare

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH0FyBHT1tsfGwHJ8RAvOfAJ9y75jQiJih+IJrbD2beYyVpYYpVwCfQQyz
/eeY22e7RSWYFbH0iLFcGEM=
=yCLN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the U-Boot mailing list