[U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH] fix initdram / use of phys_addr_t
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Wed Mar 12 23:25:33 CET 2008
On 10:38 Wed 12 Mar , Kumar Gala wrote:
> Wolfgang,
>
> Before I went and looked at every board that uses initdram I wanted to get
> some feedback of such a patch (for a wide majority of boards) would be
> acceptable.
>
> The idea is that initdram() should really have returned a 'unsigned long'.
> However if we are going to change everyone that has initdram I figure we
> should make it return a phys_addr_t.
>
> I believe you've had some discussions with Jon on the subject and I wanted
> to know if using 'phys_addr_t' here would be acceptable (before I looked
> at trying to fix up ~200 boards).
>
> The patch gives an example of what I'm looking at changing.
I'm currently fixing the get_ram_size too that is define as
long get_ram_size (volatile long *, long);
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list