[U-Boot-Users] RFC: make new image support mandatory
Bartlomiej Sieka
tur at semihalf.com
Wed Mar 26 17:31:40 CET 2008
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:16:44 +0100
> Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
>
>> now that the new image format has been merged into mainline, I
>> propose that we make it mandatory for all newly added boards. That
>> means, that each new board that gets added shall at least contain
>>
>> #define CONFIG_FIT 1
>>
>> in it's board config file; I recommend to add also
>>
>> #define CONFIG_FIT_VERBOSE 1 /* enable fit_format_{error,warning}() */
>>
>>
>> Can we agree on this?
>
> Oh my...
>
> Configuring for atstk1002 board...
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 112936 8032 216860 337828 527a4 ./u-boot
>
> with CONFIG_FIT and CONFIG_OF_LIBFDT enabled, compared to
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 87724 6840 215848 310412 4bc8c ./u-boot
BTW: were you able to compile the tools/ directory for the above board?
If yes, what were the differences versus the failing build you posted in
your other email?
>
> on v1.3.2. That's 26KB...do we really want to make something _that_
> expensive mandatory? Or can I somehow disable the old code to reclaim
> some of it?
There's no easy way to disable support for the old format currently.
Regards,
Bartlomiej
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list