[U-Boot-Users] [RFC/PATCH] SPI API improvements

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday 09 May 2008, Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
> This patch hasn't been tested on all the boards involved, so there are
> probably a few issues. For now, I'd like some comments on the new
> interface -- if it looks good, we should spend some additional effort
> to validate that it doesn't introduce any breakage. I could use some
> help with this.

just a quick glance, but do we care about U-Boot being a SPI slave ?  i only 
noticed this as i was working on the Blackfin I2C driver recently and 
realized that the I2C framework has defines for U-Boot to act as a slave.  
not that the Blackfin driver even has any of the slave stuff implemented, i 
just noticed it ;).
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20080509/c815f624/attachment.pgp