[U-Boot] MPC85xx unapplied patches

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Andy,

I have a couple of unapplied patches in my list which seem to fall
into your area of responsibility. Can you please have a look at
these:

 4316  07/18 Timur Tabi         [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Update Freescale 85xx boards to sys_eeprom.c
	-> see http://bugs.denx.de/databases/u-boot/prs/14
 5974  08/15 u-boot at bugs.denx.  [U-Boot] unassigned-patches/22: [PATCH] Removed hardcoded MxMR loop v
	-> see http://bugs.denx.de/databases/u-boot/prs/22
 5978  08/15 u-boot at bugs.denx.  [U-Boot] unassigned-patches/26: [PATCH] 85xx: socrates: Enable Lime s
	-> see http://bugs.denx.de/databases/u-boot/prs/26
 5979  08/15 u-boot at bugs.denx.  [U-Boot] unassigned-patches/27: [PATCH] 85xx: Socrates: Major code up
	-> see http://bugs.denx.de/databases/u-boot/prs/27
 6184  08/19 Kumar Gala         [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] 85xx: remove redudant code with lib_ppc/interrupt
 6337  08/21 Andrew Klossner    [U-Boot] [PATCH] [resubmit] Fix printf errors under -DDEBUG

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Remember, an int is not always 16 bits. I'm  not  sure,  but  if  the
80386  is one step closer to Intel's slugfest with the CPU curve that
is aymptotically approaching a real machine, perhaps an int has  been
implemented as 32 bits by some Unix vendors...?       - Derek Terveer