[U-Boot] /chosen node not overwritten by bootm
Jerry Van Baren
gerald.vanbaren at ge.com
Fri Sep 26 15:13:03 CEST 2008
Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Again I (and Wolfgang) stumbled about the problem, that the /chosen node is
> not overwritten by the bootm command when it already exists. This is really
> annoying, since we either:
>
> a) Have to remove the chosen node from the dts files (which is not so easy
> if we try to stay in sync with the kernel.org version)
>
> or
>
> b) Have to manually use the U-Boot "fdt" commands to overwrite the chosen node
>
> I can't remember why this current behavior is implemented this way. Jerry,
> can't we just overwrite this node even if it already exists? What would we
> loose by doing this?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Stefan
Hi Stefan,
The behavior was to mimic the behavior of the non-LIBFDT original
implementation (and because we thought it was a good idea at the time).
We originally assumed that the .dts file writer had more/better
knowledge of the system than we did (which was true at the time). This
was aggravated by the conundrum that the original FDT support didn't do
a good job of generating the /chosen properties (some were, some
weren't), so the .dts writers /had to/ pre-init some /chosen values.
The /aliases node also helped - configuration choices that use to be
implicit in the .dts /chosen node are now in /aliases (major improvement!).
I thought we turned on the "force" flag so that the /chosen properties
would be overwritten, apparently I'm mistaken.
I'm fine with overwriting the /chosen node and properties. Generate a
patch and I'll be happy to ack it.
(Note to self: maybe it is time to retire the "force" flag - it always
made me uncomfortable and is confusing. Is there anything left that we
*don't* want to force?)
Best regards,
gvb
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list