[U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 15:44 Sun 12 Apr     , David Brownell wrote:
> From: David Brownell <dbrownell at users.sourceforge.net>
> 
> Start updating DaVinci board support to reduce dependencies on
> dm644x chips and EVM-like boards ... beginning with "psc.c",
> which hosts a bunch of those dependencies:
> 
>  - Pinmux registers and their contents are SoC-specific, and
>    are also unrelated to the Power and Sleep Controller.
>    
>      * Declare more of the pinmux registers;
>      * Move their bitfield decls to a public header;
>      * Renaming thse bitfields to be clearly SoC-specific.
> 
>  - Rename the errata workarounds to be clearly SoC-specific.
> 
>  - Add a CONFIG_SOC_DM6446; use it to prevent some mux goofs.
> 
>  - Don't include the I2C support if the I2C driver is not enabled.
> 
> Plus two minor bugfixes:
> 
>  - Correct the PSC_MDSTAT mask ...  it's six bits, not five.
>    (Original DM6446 doces said five, FWIW.)
> 
>  - Correct the PWREMU_MGT mask ... don't set must-be-zero bits.
> 
> The simplest always-correct way to handle pinmux is in board_init()
> calls; or possibly in SoC-specific device setup code.  Currently
> these chips don't have such SoC-specific support.
could you split it in more logical change please
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell at users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  board/davinci/common/psc.c              |   29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  board/davinci/common/psc.h              |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/dvevm/dvevm.c             |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/schmoogie/schmoogie.c     |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/sffsdr/sffsdr.c           |    2 +-
>  board/davinci/sonata/sonata.c           |    2 +-
>  include/asm-arm/arch-davinci/hardware.h |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  include/configs/davinci_dvevm.h         |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_schmoogie.h     |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_sffsdr.h        |    1 +
>  include/configs/davinci_sonata.h        |    1 +
>  11 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/board/davinci/common/psc.c
> +++ b/board/davinci/common/psc.c
> @@ -26,13 +26,6 @@
>  #include <common.h>
>  #include <asm/arch/hardware.h>
>  
> -#define PINMUX0_EMACEN (1 << 31)
> -#define PINMUX0_AECS5  (1 << 11)
> -#define PINMUX0_AECS4  (1 << 10)
> -
> -#define PINMUX1_I2C    (1 <<  7)
> -#define PINMUX1_UART1  (1 <<  1)
> -#define PINMUX1_UART0  (1 <<  0)
>  
>  /*
>   * The DM6446 includes two separate power domains: "Always On" and "DSP". The
> @@ -57,7 +50,7 @@ void lpsc_on(unsigned int id)
>  
>  	while (REG(PSC_PTSTAT) & 0x01);
>  
> -	if ((*mdstat & 0x1f) == 0x03)
> +	if ((*mdstat & 0x3f) == 0x03)
>  		return;			/* Already on and enabled */
>  
>  	*mdctl |= 0x03;
> @@ -129,10 +122,12 @@ void davinci_enable_uart0(void)
>  	lpsc_on(DAVINCI_LPSC_UART0);
>  
>  	/* Bringup UART0 out of reset */
> -	REG(UART0_PWREMU_MGMT) = 0x0000e003;
> +	REG(UART0_PWREMU_MGMT) = 0x00006001;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SOC_DM6446
>  	/* Enable UART0 MUX lines */
> -	REG(PINMUX1) |= PINMUX1_UART0;
> +	REG(PINMUX1) |= DM644X_PINMUX1_UART0;
is this the same for all DM6446?
and the same question for the I2C and EMAC

it will be better to init pio/mux in devices file without redefined it in the
board as done for the at91

Best Regards,
J.