[U-Boot] [PATCH/next v3 27/28] Add support for building native win32 tools

[Peter Tyser]

Hi Wolfgang,

> > #1 is ugly in that 99.99% of the time an empty os_support.c file is
> > processed.
> > 
> > #2 is ugly in that the Makefile method to determine a target OS is
> > somewhat hokey and will only get hokier if/when additional OS targets
> > are supported.
> > 
> > I'd vote for #1 as I think the wasted time of processing os_support.c is
> > a drop in the bucket and it seems a bit cleaner than hacking up the
> > Makefile.
> > 
> > If others have any clever ideas let me know.
> 
> It seems there were no really clever ideas, or did I miss them?
> 
> Hm.. actually I lost track of which patch is missing. Could you please
> send me a pointer to the latest and greatest version?  Sorry & thanks.

The original v3 of "Add support for building native win32 tools" has
actually been merged already.

After merging the patch, you had requested a cleanup patch to which I
responded with the patch's rationale as well as a possible (in my
opinion) dirtier cleanup.  No one else suggested a cleaner way to
implement the change, so what is currently committed should be correct.

I'm still open to clever ideas if anyone has one though:)

Thanks,
Peter