[U-Boot] [PATCH] Support for the Calao TNY-A9260/TNY-A9G20 boards
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
plagnioj at jcrosoft.com
Tue Aug 4 21:45:20 CEST 2009
On 09:54 Mon 03 Aug , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:15:32PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> > On 10:32 Fri 24 Jul , Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> > > The Calao TNY-A9260 and TNY-9G20 are boards manufactured and sold by Calao
> > > Systems <http://www.calao-systems.com>. Their components are very
> > > similar to the AT91SAM9260EK board, so their configuration is based on
> > > the configuration of this board. There are however some differences:
> > > different clocks, no LCD, no ethernet. They also uses SPI EEPROM to store
> > > the environment.
> > eeprom for the env?
> > why not in the same storage as u-boot
>
> Storing the environment in the NAND is also an option, as you can see in the
> board configuration.
>
> > please add
> > @mkdir $(obj)include
> > otherwise the out of tree build will not work
???
all other at91 board do it
>
> So I guess all the other at91-based boards need fixing too ? They don't seem to
> do that.
>
> > > + at91_serial_hw_init();
> > > + tny_a9260_nand_hw_init();
> > > + at91_spi0_hw_init(1 << 5 | 1 << 1);
> > you can remove the 1 << 1 as the dataflash driver is deprecated now
>
> I'm not sure what you mean. There's no dataflash on this board. From what I can
> see, 1 << 1 is required to set the PC5 pin on the B peripheral controller, and
> PC5 happens to be the chip select pin for the on-board SPI EEPROM. Am I missing
> something here ?
this is for hardware chip select which we do not use as we use gpio instead
Best Regards,
J.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list