[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH] Add support for Raidsonic ICYBOX NAS4220 board

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

> >>>why?
> >>>and NACK the start.S MUST be generic
> >>>I'll rework the RM9200 code for this too
> >>start.S is not generic already.
> >but it must not become more board specific with ifdef
> 
> what could you suggest instead this?
in your case the prelooder
> 
> >
> >>and answer is: Gemini does NOT execute code from flash after start up.
> >>Some hardware copies 2048 bytes of code from flash to internal SRAM memory.
> >>After that it starts execute code from SRAM. We must use position
> >>independent code before reallocation. But start.S calls some functions,
> >>linked below (TEXT_BASE + 0x800) address.
> >>This copy loop copies code from 0x0 base address, which in case of
> >>Gemini is not Flash, but SRAM. I must add additional offset to copy code
> >>from Flash. Flash physical base is 0x30000000.
> >>Because of this specific Gemini feature, I must change start.S and
> >>create custom linker script.
> >>NOTE: this is not Faraday FA526 core specific, this is Gemini SoC
> >>specific. Other SoCs with FA526 core may use different boot approach.
> >so it will be better to use a PRELOADER such as we do for nand or onenand
> >which will boot u-boot
> 
> you suggest to use two separate boot loaders? this is bad idea.
it does not
> it's not better for users. they will have problems with firmware
> upgrade and similar.
no
> Problem is solved with several code lines in u-boot, and it is working.
> Additional package (preloader) increases system complexity and
> decreases reliability.
> btw, It is not attractive to use u-boot if I need additional loader.
please take a look on the nand_spl and onenand_ipl
the preloader is part of u-boot source
when you build you u-boot it will result to only one binary
with first the preloder and then concat u-boot itself
we do this for nand and onenand controler which are allow to download in
internal SRAM or so a small piece of code as example on samsung soc for
onenand only 2KiB of code

and with what you describe it's clearly the same for you here

Best Regards,
J.