[U-Boot] 83xx and LCRR setting
Heiko Schocher
hs at denx.de
Sat Aug 22 08:32:27 CEST 2009
Hello Kim,
Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:03:09 +0200
> Detlev Zundel <dzu at denx.de> wrote:
>
>> or maybe even always use the mask, define it in the board config and do
>> a
>>
>> #if !defined(LCCR_MASK)
>> #define LCCR_MASK 0xFFFFFFFF
>> #endif
>
> ack.
nack, it should be
#if !defined(LCCR_MASK)
#define LCCR_MASK 0x00000000
#endif
because I did:
+#if defined(CONFIG_MPC832x)
+ /* LCRR - Clock Ratio Register (10.3.1.14) */
+ im->lbus.lcrr = (im->lbus.lcrr & LCRR_MASK) | \
+ (CONFIG_SYS_LCRR & ~LCRR_MASK);
+#else
but I can do of course a:
+ /* LCRR - Clock Ratio Register (10.3.1.14) */
+ im->lbus.lcrr = (im->lbus.lcrr & ~LCRR_MASK) | \
+ (CONFIG_SYS_LCRR & LCRR_MASK);
Which way is prefered?
But I am not sure if this is necessary, I prefer here the conditional
in code, because, if I port a new board to u-boot, I immidiately
see, there is something special, if I have an 832x ... and this
construct is not so ugly I think ...
>> This really depends if and how this applies to the other members of the
>> 83xx family.
>
> they're all the same, really.
OK, if it is so ;-)
>> And, by the way, we should _really_ be using accessor macros all around
>> ;)
>
> actually LCRR itself has specific instructions that say if written, it
> then should be read, and then an isync be issued.
Hmm.. actual code did not this! Where is this documented? And shouldn;t
we update this in code?
bye
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list