[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] omap: move TI's boards to board/ti/

[Dirk Behme]

Dear Jean-Christophe,

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com>
> ---
>  Makefile                                       |   14 +++++++-------
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/beagle/Makefile            |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/beagle/beagle.c            |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/beagle/beagle.h            |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/beagle/config.mk           |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/evm/Makefile               |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/evm/config.mk              |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/evm/evm.c                  |    0
>  board/{omap3 => ti}/evm/evm.h                  |    0
>  board/{ => ti}/omap1510inn/Makefile            |    0
...

Regarding all three patches:

First, as already discussed, I don't like this and feel fine with 
board/omap3. So a formal NACK from me, knowing that it most probably 
will be overridden by some others ;)

Second, where do you know from that all these boards are from TI? Are 
you sure that they are not from SpectrumDigital, Mistral or DigiKey etc?

Third, I don't like the mixing of board and vendor name as directory 
names. It seems to me that where you think you know the vendor, you 
use the vendor name, and where you seem to not know it, you use the 
board name. So, to be consistent, and to overcome vendor name issue 
above, I'd like to use the board name everywhere. That is:

board/beagle/
board/omap3evm/
board/omap1510inn/
...
board/omap5912osk/
...
board/omap2420h4/
...
board/zoom1/
board/zoom2/
board/overo/
board/pandora/
...

To improve this even more, something like this would be nice:

board/omap3beagle/
board/omap3evm/
board/omap1innovator/
...
board/omap1osk/
...
board/omap2h4/
...
board/omap3zoom1/
board/omap3zoom2/
board/omap3overo/
board/omap3pandora/
...

Best regards

Dirk