[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] omap: move TI's boards to board/ti/

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Dirk Behme,

In message <4A9165AF.6050705 at googlemail.com> you wrote:
> 
> First, as already discussed, I don't like this and feel fine with 
> board/omap3. So a formal NACK from me, knowing that it most probably 
> will be overridden by some others ;)

Indeed. It's the current  rule  how  we  organize  boards,  and  your
personal  preferences  are  here  indeed  not reason enough to reject
these patches. Sorry.


> Second, where do you know from that all these boards are from TI? Are 
> you sure that they are not from SpectrumDigital, Mistral or DigiKey etc?

Well, if you have better information, then please fill in the gaps
here.

> Third, I don't like the mixing of board and vendor name as directory 
> names. It seems to me that where you think you know the vendor, you 
> use the vendor name, and where you seem to not know it, you use the 
> board name. So, to be consistent, and to overcome vendor name issue 
> above, I'd like to use the board name everywhere. That is:

No. The rule is that when we have a vendor with several boars (say,
more than 2), then we will create a vendor directory.

I understand that here the conditoon "vendor has more than 2 boards"
is fulfilled in several cases. Agreed?

> To improve this even more, something like this would be nice:

You may consider it nice, we don't.

So if anything in JC's patch is incorrect, please provide information
to correct it. From what I know, the patch looks OK to me (but I have
to admit that I don't know either who the actual board vendors are).

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Weekends were made for programming.                 - Karl Lehenbauer