[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 15/17] Move eNET low-level initialisation into asm

[Graeme Russ]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Graeme Russ,
> 
> In message <4A927E3B.8040903 at gmail.com> you wrote:
>>> Are you absolutely sure this is a good idea?
>> Hmm, maybe now that it's working I may not need it. I just stg pop'd
>> it and the following patches applied cleanly (although it did need to
>> auto modify patch 16) and the board still works so I guess I can ditch
>> it - Shortens patch series by one - How would you like the resend (maybe
>> same length series with Patch 15 being blank?)
> 
> I don;t use that code, and don;t even know which debug options you
> have on x86. So it's your decision in the end.

OK, I will ditch - I'll resend a blank 15 and new 16 & 17 tomorrow - It's
getting late

> 
>> Arghh, only looked at sc520.h - I just did a global search for space
>> followed by tab - 1000+ hits, but i386 and eNET are clean :)
> 
> So you have 1000+ fixes to do? Thanks in advance.

LOL - Maybe I'll take that challenge one day

> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
>