[U-Boot] [PATCH ARM 1/3] s3c24x0 code style changes

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Tue Dec 15 22:51:14 CET 2009


Dear Scott Wood,

In message <4B27FAF1.1070405 at freescale.com> you wrote:
>
> Yes, as part of the set of patches in the custodian tree.  Why introduce 
> conflicts by targetting an older tree?  What if the new patch depends on 
> previous patches that have gone into the custodian branch?

Custodians should send pull requests early and often to avoid big
differences from building up.

> I also don't see what is different about this patch than all the other 
> patches on the list that target some custodian tree.  If you're trying 

Whenever I notice that a patch does not apply against "master" or
"next" I will complain.

> to change common practice, a general announcement would be nice rather 
> than picking an arbitrary patch to make an example out of.

I've been making this very same statement before, whenever I noticed
such an issue. So far, it happened only very infrequently.

> So I should send a request immediately after every set of patches I 
> apply, with no time for futher testing or review?  What if the next 
> branch hasn't opened yet?

You should never apply any patches to  your  custodian  tree  without
review,  and  normally  only  after  sufficient  testing.  If you are
experimenting, then use a branch for this, but never do this  on  the
maste rbranch of a custodian repo.

> > If I am supposed to test something, I don;t want to have to bother
> > about some 30+ custodian trees hanging around, and finding the right
> > branch in the right tree 
> 
> I'm fine with asking people to specify exactly what branch/repo they had 
> in mind for the patch.

Fine for you, but I don't accept this.

> I don't want to have to resolve merge conflicts (inevitably sometimes 
> incorrectly) in every patch because they were based on code which has 
> been modified by a previously-applied patch.

In such a case the poster can / should ask the custodian to get his
stuff pulled.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"Pardon me for breathing, which I never do anyway so I don't know why
I bother to say it, oh God, I'm so depressed. Here's another of those
self-satisfied doors. Life! Don't talk to me about life."
                                        - Marvin the Paranoid Android


More information about the U-Boot mailing list