[U-Boot] Status open patches: 8xxx

Becky Bruce beckyb at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Feb 23 20:58:46 CET 2009


OK, I have resubmitted the MAX_MEM_MAPPED patch to apply to the  
current master u-boot tree.

-Becky

On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Becky Bruce wrote:

>
> On Feb 23, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 01:00 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>>> Dear Kim, Andy & Jon,
>>>
>>> I have the following patches still marked as open in my list. Could
>>> you please have a look...
>>>
>>> 8xxx:
>>
>>> 02/04 Jon Loeliger       Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] mpc86xx: Add
>>> support to populate addr map based on BATs
>>> 02/04 Jon Loeliger       Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] mpc8641hpcn:
>>> Change PCI MEM pci bus address
>>> 02/04 Jon Loeliger       Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mpc8641hpcn: Set
>>> up outbound pci windows before inbound
>>> 02/04 Jon Loeliger       Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/8] mpc8641hpcn:
>>> Clean up PCI mapping concepts
>>
>>> 02/12 Becky Bruce        [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate 36-
>>> bit addr map in boot messages
>>> 02/12 Becky Bruce        [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set
>>> CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default
>>> 02/12 Becky Bruce        Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set
>>> CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default
>>> 02/12 Jon Loeliger       Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MPC86xx: set
>>> CONFIG_MAX_MEM_MAPPED to 2G by default
>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Wolfgang Denk
>>
>> Wolfgang,
>>
>> It was my belief that all outstanding 86xx patches had
>> either been Acked-by me and should be picked up by either
>> Andy or Wolfgang, or had been subsumed into other already
>> applied patches.
>>
>> Becky (or Kumar?),
>>
>> Could you verify that the 36-bit and address-map related patches
>> are correct in WD's current master head and that you are happy
>> with them?  I thought we got them all there, but I could be wrong.
>> Or maybe we need to wait for a set to be picked up with the 85xx
>> tree from Andy still?
>
> So, there are only 2 patches of mine outstanding (the third message
> above is just a note about a dependency).
>
> This one should still apply and needs to be picked up, WD can pick it
> up directly because it's very small:
>
>>> 02/12 Becky Bruce        [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc8641hpcn: Indicate 36-
>>> bit addr map in boot messages
>
> The second one looks like it won't apply anymore due to a change from
> Stefan; I will submit a new one that WD can pick up directly as long
> as it's OK with you.
>
> Cheers,
> Becky
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot mailing list
> U-Boot at lists.denx.de
> http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot



More information about the U-Boot mailing list