[U-Boot] Some question about uboot
Jerry Van Baren
gerald.vanbaren at ge.com
Tue Feb 24 13:41:54 CET 2009
loody wrote:
> Dear all:
> While porting uboot, I find there are too many things I don't need at
> all, like net, i2c etc.
> How could I remove them from my uboot binary to minimize the size of
> uboot, my flash limitation is 6k?
If 6K is truly what you have, you aren't going to get there with u-boot.
I don't know what the current minimum config results in (and it will
vary depending on processor and the definition of "minimum"), but rule
of thumb is that 128K is a fairly tight u-boot; under 128K and you will
be cutting deeply. It may be possible to get it under 64K with a lot of
work, but it may be easier to start with a different code base or start
from scratch.
Can you do a two level bootstrap where you have a 6K minimal bootstrap
program that loads u-boot from somewhere else that has 128K-256K
available? Note that this is what NAND-booting systems (e.g. ARM) do -
the NAND first stage boot fits in 4K, the rest gets copied from NAND to
RAM and then run in RAM.
> I try to edit Makefile to remove them by marking some library setting,
> but it compile error after I doing so.
Libraries are crack cocaine to programmers. Once you use them, it is
really hard to give them up. :-)
> Is there any easier way to meet my requirement?
Sorry, unless there is a really significant typo in your original email,
u-boot has way too much functionality for your constraints. I don't
know what the alternatives are (there are some), but you are looking at
a very tight boot ROM probably written mostly/entirely in assembly or
very constrained C (no libraries, very tightly written, max optimization).
> Appreciate your help,
> miloody
Good luck,
gvb
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list