[U-Boot] [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Enable multi chip support in the NAND layer
Wolfgang Grandegger
wg at grandegger.com
Fri Jan 16 08:59:23 CET 2009
Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_SYS_MAX_NAND_DEVICE; i++) {
>> - if (nand_info[i].name)
>> + if (nand_info[i].name) {
>> +#if NAND_MAX_CHIPS > 1
>> + struct nand_chip *chip = nand_info[i].priv;
>> + printf("Device %d: %dx %s, sector size %u KiB\n",
>> + i, chip->numchips, nand_info[i].name,
>> + nand_info[i].erasesize >> 10);
>> +#else
>> printf("Device %d: %s, sector size %u KiB\n",
>> i, nand_info[i].name,
>> nand_info[i].erasesize >> 10);
>> +#endif
>
> Do we really need the ifdef?
Not really, "1x" (one time) would make clear that it's a single-chip device.
>> Index: u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- u-boot.orig/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
>> +++ u-boot/drivers/mtd/nand/nand.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_LIST { CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE }
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
>> +#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS 1
>> +#endif
>
> This needs to be seen from cmd_nand.c as well.
Yep, in the meantime I realized that it's already pre-set in
include/linux/mtd/nand.h:
/* The maximum number of NAND chips in an array */
#ifndef NAND_MAX_CHIPS
#define NAND_MAX_CHIPS 8
#endif
but most (if not all) boards set it to 1.
But at that occasion, I think the name should be changed to
CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_CHIPS, right?
Wolfgang.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list