[U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds

Ron Madrid ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net
Thu Jan 29 18:28:44 CET 2009


--- On Thu, 1/29/09, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:

> From: Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Exclude certain ns16550 functions from NAND_SPL builds
> To: "Ron Madrid" <ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net>
> Cc: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Date: Thursday, January 29, 2009, 2:24 AM
> Dear Ron Madrid,
> 
> In message
> <1233187331-20244-1-git-send-email-ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net>
> you wrote:
> > This patch will exclude all functions from
> drivers/serial/ns16550.c from
> > NAND_SPL builds with exception of NS16550_putc and
> NS16550_init.  This will save
> > space and remove unused code from already tightly
> constrained bootstrap images
> > for NAND_SPL builds.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ron Madrid
> <ron_madrid at sbcglobal.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/serial/ns16550.c |    5 ++++-
> >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> This is a global file, so maybe we could use a less
> specific #define
> than CONFIG_NAND_SPL for this? Eventually we need this
> later to boot
> from device FOO, and I don't want to see this grow into
> 
> if !defined(CONFIG_NAND_SPL) &&
> !defined(CONFIG_FOO) && !defined(CONFIG_BAR)
> && ...

I understand your concern.  I am not sure what other #define would work.
Are you suggesting the creation of a new #define such as #define
CONFIG_NS16550_BASIC_OPS or something like that which can be put into the
board specific config files?

Ron


More information about the U-Boot mailing list