[U-Boot] [RFC][PATCH] Update malloc to dlmalloc version 2.8.4
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Tue Jul 7 20:34:32 CEST 2009
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 12:30:18 Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Jul 7, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
> > ---
> > This is an attempt at using dlmalloc v2.8.4. Its a work in
> > progress, but
> > wanted to post to see what peoples feelings are on updating. This
> > version
> > resolves all the various warnings we see w/gcc4.4 and the older
> > version of
> > dlmalloc however the trade of is the code size has increased.
> >
> > I still need to see if we need to hand relocate the global structs
> > or not.
> >
> > This diff is just of malloc.h to see how things are cfg, and of
> > dmalloc.src vs dmalloc.c to see the changes to it.
>
> Here are some size #'s
>
> [galak at blarg u-boot-85xx]$ size u-boot
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 392040 50536 41957 484533 764b5 u-boot
> 397660 49500 42397 489557 77855 u-boot (new dlmalloc)
>
> [galak at blarg u-boot-85xx]$ size common/dlmalloc.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 4768 1056 56 5880 16f8 common/dlmalloc.o
> 10390 16 492 10898 2a92 common/dlmalloc.o (new
> dlmalloc)
to say it has increased is an understatement. i cant imagine the upstream
code increasing that much. perhaps we had trimmed/customized the
implementation so as to shrink it ?
> old dlmalloc:
> [galak at blarg u-boot-85xx]$ nm --size-sort common/dlmalloc.o
use the bloatcheck script to do a human readable compare between the two
objects. you can find it in the linux kernel.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20090707/87aa3b1e/attachment.pgp
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list