[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Enable support for 64bit printf on all PPC4xx variants

[Scott Wood]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Scott Wood,
> 
> In message <4A550FAE.30500 at freescale.com> you wrote:
>>> And by default we would add CONFIG_SYS_NO_64BIT_VSPRINTF to all board
>>> config files?
>> No, that's the point -- it would require the board maintainer to 
>> explicitly say "this board doesn't need this".  By default we would 
>> provide a correct printf.
> 
> But then applying this patch would break some boards that are working
> now. Shirking off responsibility and have the board  maintainers  fix
> it again is IMHO not the right thing to do.

What would break?  If things would no longer fit where they currently 
fit, that could happen on any change that increases code size -- 
possibly even just by changing compilers (this exact thing happened to 
the NAND bootstrap on some boards with very recent GCC).  That's life, 
and IMHO it is not reasonable to arbitrarily block changes that fix bugs 
because of the theoretical possibility that it might push someone's size 
over the limit.

A quick grep shows several instances of %ll/%L in other places that may 
not be obvious to the board maintainer (cmd_mmc, ubi, disk/part_efi, 
cpu/mpc8xxx/ddr, lmb, disk/part, cmd_ide, reiserfs).  Boards that use 
those without 64-bit printf are broken *right now*.

-Scott