[U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Define 64bit vsprintf for NAND

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Sun Jul 12 23:17:25 CEST 2009


Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,

In message <20090712193430.GB1686 at game.jcrosoft.org> you wrote:
>
> when increase the u-boot size IMHO we do need to have the board maintainer
> ack because we do not known if it will break or not the board

It's not practical to wait for all BM's to ACK such a patch - you
could reject it right away as well.

> Furehermore here all the boards maintainer are active on the ML so it's make
> sense to ask them there ack.
 
Do you really want to see - say - 200 ACK messages here? It's not
practical.

> But I'd like that we put a rules if the developer that post a patch do his
> best to have the board maintainer ack but not succed on it. The decission to
> ack it anyway will come to the Custiodians & you at the end.

If you have a proposal for rules that will actually work in such
cases, please feel free to post them here.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
"You can have my Unix system when you  pry  it  from  my  cold,  dead
fingers."                                                - Cal Keegan


More information about the U-Boot mailing list