[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2 v6] Make libgcc inclusion from common Makefile overridable by platform config file
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Jul 16 01:03:36 CEST 2009
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 18:18:20 Scott Wood wrote:
>> It seems pretty reasonable for U-Boot to provide functions like
>> raise()/abort() that take the place of a hardware exception, and display
>> an error message.
>
> i disagree here. how much of the C library are you proposing we implement ?
> if libgcc keeps calling more and more functions,
Has it been?
> you suggest we keep adding stubs for it ? seems like a never ending losing battle where we get screwed.
I don't see any slippery slope here, just a handful of functions that
any reasonable freestanding implementation is going to want (memcpy,
etc) and some way of getting an error out (raise/abort).
If it starts wanting libc functions that aren't reasonable, then of
course we should complain (possibly with patches, for those willing to
deal with the copyright assignment process).
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list