[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v5] KB9202: Add NAND support
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Jul 16 20:45:57 CEST 2009
On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 09:57:13PM +0200, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> On 15:51 Wed 24 Jun , Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:23:05PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > > Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <matthias at kaehlcke.net>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > El Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:19:40PM -0500 Scott Wood ha dit:
> > >
> > > > I get conflicts in kb9202.h. Is this against an arch tree, or does it
> > > > need to be respun?
> > >
> > > The previous patches were against v2009-03, as i had problems
> > > building the current git head for the kb9202 when i started working on
> > > the patch. Did you apply the first patch of this series when you got
> > > the conflict? This patch is based on the current HEAD.
> >
> > No - if it depends on other patches that go through an arch tree, then this
> > patch should go through that tree as well.
> >
> > Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> Scott I've not follow this patch but for the arm part it's looks fine so I'll
> let you handle
It still does not apply to the current tree, so I cannot accept it as is.
The NAND tree is not an appropriate route for unrelated changes to a
board config file (such as CONFIG_BOOTARGS/CONFIG_BOOTCOMMAND) to go --
and even if it were, I don't have an easily applyable version of patch
1/2 (the mailing list archives mangle things).
Matthias, can you resend a patch that just adds the NAND driver (for me),
and a separate patch that just touches the board config (for the arch
tree)?
-Scott
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list