[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] arm nomadik: gpio and i2c

[Heiko Schocher]

Hello Alessandro,

Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>> what with deinit_pin(pin, function)? That would be in shape with init_pin()?
> 
> No, it's not clear what it is. I'd rename "init" to "setup", adding an AF

ok.

> argument. So I can setup it as AF2, or as GPIO-OUT, or whatever.

No I don;t understand you ;-) What means AF? Ah, while typing this, my
brain parsed AF to Alternate Function, right?

So, I am fine with that.

>> (There, we could also unset the marker, that this pin is no longer used
>> for gpio ...)
> 
> No, I wouldn't like the marker. It's a boot loader, it shouldn't
> overdo sanity checks.  Most of the times it runs the same "bootcmd"
> over and over. In the rare but important case it's a debugging tool, it
> shouldn't force policy, in my opinion (I already have problems with the
> kernel gpiolib, that doesn't let me fix mishaps at will).

Ok, it was just a thought. If others agree I am fine with it.

>> Also, a board can have more then one gpio adapter, how we address
>> such a case?
> 
> As Wolfgang suggested, we don't.  If atmel calls it PORTC-12 I have no
> problem calling it gpio-76 by concatentating the ports as 0..31,
> 32..64, ...  It's still better to have a gpio command than doing "mw
> <addr> <val>" over and over.

Huh, missed I an Email? Didn;t see a response from Wolfgang ...

Ah, yes, this is also an option, so we need to configure when
adding a gpio_adapter, with which GPIO number the GPIOs in this adapter
starts and how many GPIOs are accessible through it... OK, I am also
fine with such an option.

> In my old-fashioned way, it should be as simple as possible, but no simpler.

;-)

bye
Heiko
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany