[U-Boot] [PATCH] Refresh LZMA-lib to v4.65

[Wolfgang Denk]

Dear Luigi Mantellini,

In message <b73e93990907271302g31b398d3qf4acf29d1af1351c at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> I have a stupid question: why the depend uses CPPFLAGS instead instead CFLAGS?

Because depend runs "$(CC) -M", i. e. just the preprocessor, so any
additional flags needed for later compiler passes don't matter anyway.

> can this patch be acceptable? Or there is something that I don't understand?
>
> diff --git a/rules.mk b/rules.mk
> index 6f999dd..998dd4e 100644
> --- a/rules.mk
> +++ b/rules.mk
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ $(obj).depend:        $(src)Makefile
> $(TOPDIR)/config.mk $(SRCS)
>                 @rm -f $@
>                 @for f in $(SRCS); do \
>                         g=`basename $$f | sed -e 's/\(.*\)\.\w/\1.o/'`; \
> -                       $(CC) -M $(HOSTCFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) -MQ
> $(obj)$$g $$f >> $@ ; \
> +                       $(CC) -M $(HOSTCFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)
> -MQ $(obj)$$g $$f >> $@ ; \
>                 done

Looks wrong to me.

> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Mike Frysinger<vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Monday 27 July 2009 15:12:11 Luigi Mantellini wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Mike Frysinger<vapier at gentoo.org> wrote:
...

Arghhh. Mike already told you before: please do not top post / full
quote. Please read http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html to
understand what this means.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
A princess should not be afraid -- not with a brave knight to protect
her.
	-- McCoy, "Shore Leave", stardate 3025.3