[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/2] arm nomadik: add i2c

[Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD]

On 09:51 Tue 28 Jul     , Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Jean-Christophe,
> 
> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> diff --git a/include/configs/nhk8815.h b/include/configs/nhk8815.h
> >> index 3e2e09f..8a83d92 100644
> >> --- a/include/configs/nhk8815.h
> >> +++ b/include/configs/nhk8815.h
> >> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
> >>  #define CONFIG_SYS_GBL_DATA_SIZE	128	/* for initial data */
> >>  #define CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF	/* mtd desires this */
> >>  
> >> -#define CONFIG_MISC_INIT_R	/* call misc_init_r during start up */
> >> +#define BOARD_LATE_INIT		/* call board_late_init during start up */
> >>  
> >>  /* timing informazion */
> >>  #define CONFIG_SYS_HZ		1000 /* Mandatory... */
> >> @@ -110,6 +110,22 @@
> >>  #define CONFIG_PL01x_PORTS	{ (void *)CFG_SERIAL0, (void *)CFG_SERIAL1 }
> >>  #define CONFIG_PL011_CLOCK	48000000
> >>  
> >> +/* i2c, for the port extenders (uses gpio.c in board directory) */
> >> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >> +#include <asm/arch/gpio.h>
> > I really do not like to include file from the config
> > and it will be difficult to clean up when moving to Kconfig
> >> +#define CONFIG_CMD_I2C
> >> +#define CONFIG_SOFT_I2C
> >> +#define CONFIG_SYS_I2C_SPEED	400000
> >> +#define __SDA			63
> >> +#define __SCL			62
> >> +#define I2C_SDA(x)		nmk_gpio_set(__SDA, x)
> >> +#define I2C_SCL(x)		nmk_gpio_set(__SCL, x)
> >> +#define I2C_READ		(nmk_gpio_get(__SDA)!=0)
> >> +#define I2C_ACTIVE		nmk_gpio_dir(__SDA, 1)
> >> +#define I2C_TRISTATE		nmk_gpio_dir(__SDA, 0)
> >> +#define I2C_DELAY     (udelay(2))
> > it will better to define a couple of generic function where we implement it
> > as this
> > i2c_sda()
> > i2c_scl()
> > i2c_read()
> > i2c_activate()
> > i2c_tristate()
> > i2c_delay()
> > i2c_get_bus_num()
> > i2c_set_bus_num()
> > i2c_get_bus_speed()
> > i2c_set_bus_speed()
> > i2c_init()
> 
> I posted such a suggestion in this thread, see:
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/056934.html
sorry I've not seen yet it but full ack of the proposition :)
> 
> I got no responses for this suggestion, so I talked with Wolfgang,
> and he convinced me, that this is not necessary.

Best Regards,
J.