[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] TI: OMAP3: Overo Tobi ethernet support

[Paulraj, Sandeep]

> 
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 10:08:08AM -0700, Ben Warren wrote:
> > Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
> >>>> Most probably we need a Signed-off-by then ;)
> >>>>
> >>> Take your pick. Either a:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> >>>
> >>> Or apply the below revised patch instead.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> SMC911X: Add chip auto detection
> >>>
> >>> Refactor the smc911x driver to allow for detecting when the chip is
> >>> missing.
> >>> I.e. the detect_chip() function is called earlier and will abort
> >>> gracefully
> >>> when the Chip ID read returns all 1's.
> >>>
> >>> Based on testing from Steve Sakoman, the test has been moved up in the
> >>> function to not hang on systems without ethernet.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net>
> >>> Acked-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme at googlemail.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Ben Warren <biggerbadderben at gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>
> >> Are we sure we have Ben's ACK.
> >>
> >>
> > Yeah.  I can't find it in my 'Sent' folder, but seem to remember ACK'ing
> > this already.  If not, consider this an ACK.
> 
> I just brought it forward from the previous patch, and I wasn't the one
> who added it back then. My bad, I should have dropped all acks based on
> the new contents.
> 
> 
> -Olof
I'm a little confused :-)
I realized when I was trying to apply this patch that this is already part of the u-boot-ti and u-boot-arm trees.

I am referring to
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-ti.git;a=commitdiff;h=4eb3af078267e103fb957cb831497cf7670fb3f4

The patch in this e-mail chain was supposed to fix a bug discovered after Tom updated his tree.

Since this patch was already part of u-boot-ti and u-boot-arm trees, I don't see how this fixes a bug.

Can the u-boot-ti tree be checked to see if it works with / without TOBI?

I don't have a single OMAP3 EVM(I work only on DaVinci's) and hence can't test myself.

Sandeep