[U-Boot] [PATCH V2] ppc4xx: Initialize magnetic couplers in PLU405
Matthias Fuchs
matthias.fuchs at esd.eu
Fri Oct 23 17:10:56 CEST 2009
Wolfgang,
you are right, but I didn't want to trigger a discussion
about CAN in U-Boot. This has nothing to do with CAN :-)
Also I am using the controller in a slightly untypical manner.
I also dont't want to add sja1000 Linux kernel headers (from
SocketCAN) - a) they do not contains the wanted C struct and
b) they don't use the basic CAN mode of the chip.
So when you want me just to move the SJA1000 specific struct
and the two defines into a header and place that under include,
I will do so. But please nothing else.
Matthias
On Friday 23 October 2009 16:53, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Matthias Fuchs,
>
> In message <200910231638.11295.matthias.fuchs at esd.eu> you wrote:
> > This patch fixes an ugly behavior of the IL712 magnetic couplers
> > as used on PLU405. These parts will remember their last state
> > over a power cycle which might cause unwanted behavior.
> ...
> > --- a/board/esd/plu405/plu405.c
> > +++ b/board/esd/plu405/plu405.c
> > @@ -45,6 +45,55 @@ const unsigned char fpgadata[] =
> > */
> > #include "../common/fpga.c"
> >
> > +/*
> > + * SJA1000 register layout in basic can mode
> > + */
> > +struct sja1000_basic_s {
> > + u8 cr;
> > + u8 cmr;
> > + u8 sr;
> > + u8 ir;
> > + u8 ac;
> > + u8 am;
> > + u8 btr0;
> > + u8 btr1;
> > + u8 oc;
> > + u8 txb[10];
> > + u8 rxb[10];
> > + u8 unused;
> > + u8 cdr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define SJA1000_CR_RR 0x01
> > +#define SJA1000_OC_MODE0 0x01
>
> Hmm... a SJA1000 is a pretty generic piece of hardware, and in no way
> specific to the plu405 board. Would it not make sense to create as
> separate header file for this? Eventually other boards will need to
> interface to SJA1000's, too ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list