[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-atmel/for2010.12
Reinhard Meyer
u-boot at emk-elektronik.de
Tue Dec 7 00:43:40 CET 2010
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
>
> In message<4CFCB04B.10406 at emk-elektronik.de> you wrote:
>> Dear Wolfgang, Albert,
>>
>> The following changes since commit 49733aa0b9d29803384ad4bce74985f4bbe7e9aa:
>> Wolfgang Denk (1):
>> Merge branch 'master' of /home/wd/git/u-boot/custodians
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>> git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git for2010.12
>>
>> Andreas Bießmann (1):
>> arm920t/at91/reset: board_reset: define weak symbol
>>
>> Reinhard Meyer (3):
>> AT91: gen_atmel_mci.c: fix bug when Slot B is used
>> AT91: fix EMAC gpio init in at91sam9260_devices.c
>> AT91: add TOP9000 support
>>
>> andreas.devel at googlemail.com (4):
>> at91rm9200ek: add configure target for RAM boot
>> MAKEALL: fix AT91
>> arm920t/at91/timer: replace bss variables by gd
>> at91rm9200ek: fix SDRAM initialistation values
>>
>> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-
>> MAKEALL | 18 +-
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c | 8 +-
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/timer.c | 29 +-
>> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c | 5 +
>> arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h | 1 +
>> board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/config.mk | 2 -
>> board/emk/top9000/Makefile | 54 ++++
>> board/emk/top9000/spi.c | 61 ++++
>> board/emk/top9000/top9000.c | 290 +++++++++++++++++++
>> boards.cfg | 5 +-
>> drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c | 1 +
>> include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h | 18 ++-
>> include/configs/top9000.h | 314 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 14 files changed, 771 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>> delete mode 100644 board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/config.mk
>> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/Makefile
>> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/spi.c
>> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/top9000.c
>> create mode 100644 include/configs/top9000.h
>
> Hm... what I see looks quite different:
>
> MAINTAINERS | 3 +-
> MAKEALL | 18 +-
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/reset.c | 8 +-
> arch/arm/cpu/arm920t/at91/timer.c | 29 +-
> arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c | 5 +
> arch/arm/include/asm/global_data.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/start.S | 8 +
> arch/powerpc/lib/board.c | 11 +
> arch/sh/cpu/sh2/start.S | 8 +-
> arch/sh/cpu/sh3/start.S | 8 +-
> arch/sh/cpu/sh4/start.S | 10 +-
> board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/config.mk | 2 -
> board/emk/top9000/Makefile | 54 ++++
> board/emk/top9000/spi.c | 61 ++++
> board/emk/top9000/top9000.c | 290 +++++++++++++++++++
> board/freescale/mpc8641hpcn/mpc8641hpcn.c | 3 -
> board/freescale/p2020ds/p2020ds.c | 3 -
> boards.cfg | 5 +-
> common/hwconfig.c | 14 +-
> drivers/mmc/gen_atmel_mci.c | 1 +
> include/configs/MPC8360EMDS.h | 4 +-
> include/configs/MPC8536DS.h | 5 +-
> include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h | 3 +-
> include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h | 5 +-
> include/configs/at91rm9200ek.h | 18 ++-
> include/configs/atngw100.h | 2 -
> include/configs/mimc200.h | 2 -
> include/configs/r7780mp.h | 1 -
> include/configs/top9000.h | 314 +++++++++++++++++++++
> include/pci_ids.h | 1 +
> 30 files changed, 820 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/config.mk
> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/Makefile
> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/spi.c
> create mode 100644 board/emk/top9000/top9000.c
> create mode 100644 include/configs/top9000.h
Have a look at:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-atmel.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for2010.12
There it does not show the extra files you seem to see.
Please verify that.
> Please try and figure out why we now see entries like this one:
>
> Author: andreas.devel at googlemail.com<andreas.devel at googlemail.com>
>
> As far as I can tell, Andreas' submissions on the mailing list look like this:
>
> From: Andreas Bießmann<andreas.devel at googlemail.com>
>
> The patchwork entry looks also clean to me:
>
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/73644/
>
Andreas did indeed post from two different e-mail accounts. I used the patchwork
"Download mbox" function to get the patches. Apparently the "sharp S" in one
of the two e-mail addresses he uses bites the system.
I don't know how to fix that. If we use patchwork it makes no sense to dig out
the e-mails with patches from an e-mail archive.
> Not pulled.
Understandable, but at a loss to what's going wrong here.
Best regards,
Reinhard Meyer
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list