[U-Boot] [PATCH ARM 3/3 v3] change s3c24x0 register struct members to lower case

[Tom]

Minkyu Kang wrote:
> Dear Tom,
> 
> On 12 February 2010 22:07, Tom <Tom.Rix at windriver.com> wrote:
>> Minkyu Kang wrote:
>>> Dear Kevin,
>>>
>>> On 12 February 2010 05:29, kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk
>>> <kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> On 11/02/2010 19:04, Tom wrote:
>>>>> Kevin Morfitt wrote:
>>>>>> Changes the names of the s3c24x0 register struct members from
>>>>>> upper-case
>>>>>> to lower-case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Morfitt<kevin.morfitt at fearnside-systems.co.uk>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2 changes - re-number to be 3/3
>>>>>> v3 changes - re-based to modified patch 2/3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> checkpatch.pl reports no errors. MAKEALL ARM9 reports no new warnings
>>>>>> or errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I had problem applying v2 patch 1 to u-boot-arm and u-boot-samsung
>>>>> Can you check if this patchset is correctly rebased.
>>>> It's based against Monday's u-boot-master which hasn't changed since
>>>> then. v1 was against u-boot-samsung but Wolfgang asked me to do it
>>>> against u-boot-master:
>>>>
>>>> "Please adhere to posting guidelines. Patches posted ere MUST be based
>>>> either on the "master" or on the "next" trees."
>>>>
>>>> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-December/065420.html
>>> If so, who can apply this patchset?
>>> I think need to rebase for u-boot-arm or u-boot-samsung.
>>>
>> Kevin is correct.
>>
>> This is a problem with the arm and samsung branch diverging from master.
>> The testing of this patch will stall a bit until we are sync-ed up again.
>> I will make sure this happens in the next day or so.
>>

ARM has been rebased to master.
I checked this patchset yesterday and there was still a problem with applying 
them.  Ultimately I think this set will need to be rebased.  Waiting until the
ARM changes have been pulled into master is fine.

>> Minkyu,
>> There are 3 commits on samsung/master.
>> Are these ready for a pull request?
>> Please send me one if they are.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
> 
> I'll send it next week.
> 
No rush, this is fine.
Tom

> Thanks
> Minkyu Kang