[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 03/10] 83xx/85xx/86xx: LBC register cleanup

[Kim Phillips]

On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:15:07 -0500
Becky Bruce <beckyb at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> This isn't *ELBC*, it's the existence of any sort of LBC.  ELBC is  
> determined per-board in the fine grained configs.  There are 2 configs.

that's what I was suggesting to change; to group and centralize the
definition of the two seemingly related configs - also because the ELBC
should be done at the SoC level.

See Scott's response though - I don't know how long the ELBC ifdef list
is, but introducing a header file per soc sounds like a bit out of
scope for this patchseries - it already cleans up a bunch of stuff.

> -B

Kim

p.s. please don't top-post :).

> On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:12:02 -0500
> > Becky Bruce <beckyb at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h b/arch/powerpc/ 
> >> include/asm/config.h
> >> index fc3facb..01036f3 100644
> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h
> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h
> >> @@ -76,4 +76,10 @@
> >> /* Relocation to SDRAM works on all PPC boards */
> >> #define CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS
> >>
> >> +/* Most PPC SOCs have a LBC so define this here */
> >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MPC85xx) || defined(CONFIG_MPC86xx) || \
> >> +	defined(CONFIG_MPC83xx)
> >> +#define CONFIG_FSL_LBC
> >
> > Instead of in the configs (such as what patch 1 in this series
> > continues to do), can we do ELBC determination here, based on
> > finer-grained configs such as 831x, 837x, etc?
> >
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Kim
> 
>