[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 03/10] 83xx/85xx/86xx: LBC register cleanup
Kim Phillips
kim.phillips at freescale.com
Tue Jun 8 20:43:36 CEST 2010
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:28:48 -0500
Becky Bruce <beckyb at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:15:07 -0500
> > Becky Bruce <beckyb at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >
> >> This isn't *ELBC*, it's the existence of any sort of LBC. ELBC is
> >> determined per-board in the fine grained configs. There are 2
> >> configs.
> >
> > that's what I was suggesting to change; to group and centralize the
> > definition of the two seemingly related configs - also because the
> > ELBC
> > should be done at the SoC level.
> >
> > See Scott's response though - I don't know how long the ELBC ifdef
> > list
> > is, but introducing a header file per soc sounds like a bit out of
> > scope for this patchseries - it already cleans up a bunch of stuff.
>
> I think it is out of scope here - I think this is fine the way it is,
> at least for now. I'd like to get these cleanups in as soon as
> possible before someone else replicates more code.
>
> We can post a followon later to change how we deal with ELBC/LBC; and
> there are also more cleanups to be done - for example, there's still
> code that accesses lbc space not using IO accessors. I've cleaned up
> the BR/OR cases, but I want to eventually fix it all. Unfortunately,
> I'm out of time at this point. This patch series is a significant
> step forward, but there's still more work to be done.
ok but e.g., patch 1 in this series omits the MPC837XERDB, which needs
to be fixed.
I was curious so I compiled the ELBC CONFIG_ list, in case you want to
change patch 1 in the series to _delete_ the entries in the board
configs and add them as pointed out in this patch:
MPC831x
MPC837x
MPC8536
MPC8569
MPC8572
and, of course, the Pxxxx's.
> Cheers,
> Becky
Kim
>
> >
> >> -B
> >
> > Kim
> >
> > p.s. please don't top-post :).
> >
> >> On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:12:02 -0500
> >>> Becky Bruce <beckyb at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h b/arch/powerpc/
> >>>> include/asm/config.h
> >>>> index fc3facb..01036f3 100644
> >>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h
> >>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config.h
> >>>> @@ -76,4 +76,10 @@
> >>>> /* Relocation to SDRAM works on all PPC boards */
> >>>> #define CONFIG_RELOC_FIXUP_WORKS
> >>>>
> >>>> +/* Most PPC SOCs have a LBC so define this here */
> >>>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MPC85xx) || defined(CONFIG_MPC86xx) || \
> >>>> + defined(CONFIG_MPC83xx)
> >>>> +#define CONFIG_FSL_LBC
> >>>
> >>> Instead of in the configs (such as what patch 1 in this series
> >>> continues to do), can we do ELBC determination here, based on
> >>> finer-grained configs such as 831x, 837x, etc?
> >>>
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Kim
> >>
> >>
>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list