[U-Boot] [PATCH] examples/standalone: Remove relocation compile flags for PowerPC
Peter Tyser
ptyser at xes-inc.com
Tue Jun 15 22:15:05 CEST 2010
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 14:45 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Peter Tyser wrote:
> > Was commenting out the 'ifeq' above necessary? It shouldn't be, so my
> > first question would be why it was needed.
>
> Probably because I was using an older U-Boot. When I switch to the latest
> code, it compiles fine.
>
> However, my entry point is not at 40000:
>
> $ nm -n examples/standalone/flash_wp
> 00040000 t command_exit
> 000400c4 t is_locked
> 00040184 T flash_wp
> 000403d0 T dummy
>
> 'flash_wp' should be at 40000. command_exit and is_locked are two functions
> in my code. command_exit, however, is not the first function, it's the third.
I think by default its not possible to guarantee function order in gcc's
output if a file contains multiple functions. We could create a basic
linker script... I think we could also do it with some gcc/ld-foo like:
--- a/examples/standalone/Makefile
+++ b/examples/standalone/Makefile
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ CPPFLAGS += -I..
# inconsistent.
ifeq ($(ARCH),powerpc)
CFLAGS := $(filter-out $(RELFLAGS),$(CFLAGS))
+CFLAGS += -fno-toplevel-reorder
endif
all: $(obj).depend $(OBJS) $(LIB) $(SREC) $(BIN) $(ELF)
@@ -88,7 +89,7 @@ $(LIB): $(obj).depend $(LIBOBJS)
$(ELF):
$(obj)%: $(obj)%.o $(LIB)
- $(LD) -g -Ttext $(STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR) \
+ $(LD) -g -Ttext $(STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR) -sort-common \
-o $@ -e $(SYM_PREFIX)$(notdir $(<:.o=)) $< $(LIB) \
-L$(gcclibdir) -lgcc
Could you try the above change with your flash_wp test case? Or make
the flash_wp app public? It should put the first function at the base
of the image in theory.
Best,
Peter
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list