[U-Boot] [PATCH 06/11] at91: Add defines for spi SoC access

[Reinhard Meyer]

Dear Alexander Stein,
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein at systec-electronic.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> index c520e89..75d4324 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-at91/at91_spi.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,20 @@ typedef struct at91_spi {
>  	at91_pdc_t	pdc;
>  } at91_spi_t;

If we touch header and driver anyway, we could get rid of the depreciated typedefs,
to get conform to the coding style.

See discussion about that 1-2 days ago :)

>  
> +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SPIEN	0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_CR_SWRST	0x00000080
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MSTR	0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_MODFDIS	0x00000004
> +#define AT91_SPI_MR_PCS		0x000f0000
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_SR_RXBUFF	0x00000040
> +#define AT91_SPI_SR_SPIENS	0x00010000
> +
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_NCPHA	0x00000001
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBS	0x00ff0000
> +#define AT91_SPI_CSR_DLYBCT	0xff000000
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

After that patch, do we still need LEGACY?

Best Regards,
Reinhard