[U-Boot] Weak symbols: request for comments
Andreas Bießmann
andreas.devel at googlemail.com
Fri Nov 5 12:21:19 CET 2010
Dear Sebastien Carlier,
Am 05.11.2010 11:39, schrieb Sebastien Carlier:
> Hello all,
> So, U-boot needs to be fixed. I can see the following ways forward:
>
> 1.1) Stop using weak symbols; use pre-initialized function pointers
> instead (possibly grouped in a struct, for cleanliness).
> This has the benefit of offering a clear interface and being
> independent of toolchain details.
sounds good to me despite of grouping. Isn't grouping tough due to
different weak functions for each architecture?
> 1.2) Use regular (non-weak) extern declarations for overridable stuff;
> collect all default weak symbols into a separate library archive,
> to be supplied last to the linker.
sounds messy to me. How about different weak symbols for different
architectures?
regards
Andreas Bießmann
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list