[U-Boot] [PATCH] orion5x: optimize window size computation
Prafulla Wadaskar
prafulla at marvell.com
Wed Oct 6 11:34:00 CEST 2010
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.aribaud at free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 11:22 AM
> To: Chris Moore
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot at lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare;
> Prabhanjan Sarnaik
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] orion5x: optimize window size
> computation
>
> Le 05/10/2010 23:40, Chris Moore a écrit :
> > Hi Prafulla,
> >
> > Le 05/10/2010 07:57, Prafulla Wadaskar a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de
> >>> [mailto:u-boot-bounces at lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Albert Aribaud
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 3:52 AM
> >>> To: u-boot at lists.denx.de
> >>> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] orion5x: optimize window size
> computation
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Chris Moore<moore at free.fr>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> This is a simple optimization of the orion5x window size
> >>> computation. This code was contributed by Chris Moore so
> >>> I put his Signed-off-by rather than mine.
> >> This is wrong, you should be singed-off since you are posting and
> >> Chris can be contributor
> >> Or let him post the patch.
Ack
> >
> > I asked Albert to post the patch as I am mainly a U-Boot
> lurker and I
> > have no U-Boot git tree.
> > If there is a problem I don't mind if he signs off either with or
> > without me.
>
> Or how about a double Signed-off-by?
BTW: double Signed-off-by is not a bad idea, lot other patches follows the same.
I wouldn't mind to ack such patches.
May be Wolfgang can better comment on this.
>
> >> BTW: How much this saves on size?
>
> More than 53% of the code size! That's 28 bytes instead of 60. :)
Great!! Thanks Chris, we will update the same for Kirkwood too.
Regards..
Prafulla . .
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list