[U-Boot] [PATCH 13/17] post/i2c: Add ability to ignore I2C devices

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Thu Sep 30 19:54:33 CEST 2010


Dear Peter Tyser,

In message <1285868400.28947.19878.camel at petert> you wrote:
> > So the IGNORE_LIST is intended for devices that may or may not be
> > present, and neither state is considered an error?
> 
> Correct.  And also for devices that may or may not be present, but are
> impossible to determine if they should/shouldn't be present, so its
> impossible to determine what an error case is (if that makes sense...).
> 
> I gave a few examples in the original patch of when this might be
> useful.  Most of the examples could be better solved by a more
> complicated, dynamically generated I2C_ADDR_LIST (eg detect if an XMC
> card is present, and if so, add device 0x50 to the list of expected
> devices), but it seems like overkill for a simple POST.

Now I understand your intention. I didn't when reading the description
in the initial commit message. Maybe you can make this a bit more
explicit for slow thinkers like me.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Monday is an awful way to spend one seventh of your life.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list