[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/85xx: Add ULPI and UTMI USB Phy support for P1010/P1014
Kumar Gala
galak at kernel.crashing.org
Mon Aug 8 22:46:49 CEST 2011
On Aug 8, 2011, at 3:15 PM, Remy Bohmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/1 Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>:
>> From: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh at freescale.com>
>>
>> Add UTMI and ULPI PHY support for USB controller on qoriq series of
>> processors with internal UTMI PHY implemented, for example P1010/P1014
>> - Use both getenv() and hwconfig to get USB phy type till getenv()
>> is depricated
>> - Introduce CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY to specify if soc
>> has internal UTMI phy
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehresh at freescale.com>
>> CC: Remy Bohmer <linux at bohmer.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h | 2 +
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
>> index 04ca989..d9d04e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h
>> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@
>> #define CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS 1
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_CCSRBAR_DEFAULT 0xff700000
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_PCIE_COMPAT "fsl,qoriq-pcie-v2.2"
>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY
>>
>> /* P1011 is single core version of P1020 */
>> #elif defined(CONFIG_P1011)
>> @@ -141,6 +142,7 @@
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_ESDHC111
>> #define CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS 1
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_CCSRBAR_DEFAULT 0xff700000
>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY
>>
>> /* P1015 is single core version of P1024 */
>> #elif defined(CONFIG_P1015)
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
>> index 6e0043a..66b7da5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-fsl.c
>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>> /*
>> - * (C) Copyright 2009 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
>> + * (C) Copyright 2009, 2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
>> *
>> * (C) Copyright 2008, Excito Elektronik i Sk=E5ne AB
>> *
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
>> #include <usb.h>
>> #include <asm/io.h>
>> #include <usb/ehci-fsl.h>
>> +#include <hwconfig.h>
>>
>> #include "ehci.h"
>> #include "ehci-core.h"
>> @@ -39,6 +40,11 @@
>> int ehci_hcd_init(void)
>> {
>> struct usb_ehci *ehci;
>> + char usb_phy[5];
>> + const char *phy_type = NULL;
>> + size_t len;
>> +
>> + usb_phy[0] = '\0';
>>
>> ehci = (struct usb_ehci *)CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_ADDR;
>> hccr = (struct ehci_hccr *)((uint32_t)&ehci->caplength);
>> @@ -52,10 +58,35 @@ int ehci_hcd_init(void)
>> out_be32(&ehci->snoop2, 0x80000000 | SNOOP_SIZE_2GB);
>>
>> /* Init phy */
>> - if (!strcmp(getenv("usb_phy_type"), "utmi"))
>> - out_le32(&(hcor->or_portsc[0]), PORT_PTS_UTMI);
>> + if (hwconfig_sub("usb1", "phy_type"))
>> + phy_type = hwconfig_subarg("usb1", "phy_type", &len);
>> else
>> + phy_type = getenv("usb_phy_type");
>
> Please insert an empty line here for readability.
>
>> + if (!phy_type) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY
>> + /* if none specified assume internal UTMI */
>> + strcpy(usb_phy, "utmi");
>> + phy_type = usb_phy;
>> +#else
>> + printf("WARNING: USB phy type not defined !!\n");
>> + return -1;
>> +#endif
>> + }
>
> Alignment is messy due to this patch. Please fix.
>
>> + if (!strcmp(phy_type, "utmi")) {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY)
>> + setbits_be32(&ehci->control, PHY_CLK_SEL_UTMI);
>> + setbits_be32(&ehci->control, UTMI_PHY_EN);
>> + udelay(1000); /* delay required for PHY Clk to appear */
>> +#endif
>> + out_le32(&(hcor->or_portsc[0]), PORT_PTS_UTMI);
>> + } else {
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_USB_INTERNAL_UTMI_PHY)
>> + clrbits_be32(&ehci->control, UTMI_PHY_EN);
>> + setbits_be32(&ehci->control, PHY_CLK_SEL_ULPI);
>> + udelay(1000); /* delay required for PHY Clk to appear */
>> +#endif
>> out_le32(&(hcor->or_portsc[0]), PORT_PTS_ULPI);
>> + }
>
> The ifdef-ery makes the code somewhat messy as well. Can it be written
> somewhat else?
> Apart from that and the style issues, no remarks or concerns.
Not really sure how to do that. The patch is a bit more messy than the actual code.
- k
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list